We recently caught a flight aboard a Boeing 767. The plane was fairly empty, and most of the two dozen passengers were seated near the front. Just before takeoff the flight attendant announced that "for balance purposes" seven people from the front of the plane would be required to move to the back. Now, maybe it's just me, but it's quite a confidence buster to learn that the safety of an aircraft the size of a 767 might hinge on the seating position of seven people.

You're getting the wrong idea. The juggling was necessary to fine tune the aircraft's center-of-gravity (CG) as mandated by the preflight weight-and-balance scheme. Had those passengers not been relocated, rest assured the plane would have taken off and landed just fine, albeit officially out of tolerance. A plane's center of gravity will shift as it consumes fuel, so both a takeoff and landing CG are predetermined and checked against the limits.

The weight and placement of passengers, fuel, luggage and freight, are worked out prior to flight. Occasionally -- at smaller regional carriers, for one -- the pilots themselves are responsible for the number crunching, but generally the grunt work is taken care of by the folks backstage, who run the data through a computer. Usually the task is complete before leaving the gate, but sometimes, especially if last-minute changes were made, it'll be sent to the crew remotely by radio or data-link after pushing back.

Obviously the placement of seven people on a small commuter plane is more critical than on a widebody Boeing, but only an extreme out-of-balance condition will render any aircraft unflyable. Improper CG computation is more likely to increase fuel consumption than cause an accident. Off the top of my head I can't recall any large airliner having crashed from weight or CG-related trouble. Initial speculation blamed the 2003 crash of a US Airways Express turboprop on a balance problem, but the investigation soon turned to mechanical failure.

Remember that even a full complement of passengers entails only a fraction of a widebody plane's sum heft. With tanks filled and every seat taken, a 767 tips the scales at about 400,000 pounds, but the portion represented by passengers and their luggage weighs but a tenth of that. (In a column several months ago we discussed the use of standardized weights for passengers and their belongings.)

I'm a Channel 9 devotee when I fly United Airlines, and among the more mysterious bits of lingo I hear is use of the word "heavy," suffixing a plane's flight number. For example, a controller will say, "United 502 heavy, descend to six thousand feet ..."

I'd normally shy away from addressing something so arcane, but I get this question more often than you might think. Channel 9, if you're not familiar, refers to the armrest dial position through which United's passengers may listen to air-to-ground communications during flight.

The "heavy" distinction is used by air traffic control and pertains to all aircraft with a maximum gross weight in excess of 255,000 pounds. The wingtips of larger planes, you may recall, are known to spin away powerful, potentially hazardous vortices -- especially during takeoffs and landings -- and separation parameters are more stringent when following behind or below such an aircraft. Air traffic control already knows who is "heavy" and who isn't, but the radio call serves as a reminder both for controllers and crews. In most countries outside the United States the distinction is not used.

As I've opined before, eavesdropping on pilot-controller conversation is either extremely fascinating or tediously indecipherable, depending on the listener's infatuation with flight. As far as I know, United remains the only party offering this service, though Air France and Emirates are two of several carriers now showing live-feed video from fuselage-mounted cameras. On Emirates 777-300s, using your in-seat selector, you can switch back and forth between two angles -- one aimed straight ahead, allowing great shots of the runway during nighttime landings, the other pointed at the ground, giving a spy-cam view of streets and houses.

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Do you have questions for Salon's aviation expert? Send them to AskThePilot and look for answers in a future column.

Recent Stories