In the Senate we trust

The nation's future also depends on the outcome of three Senate races, which the Democrats could sweep.

Sep 23, 2004 | The passion invested by the Democratic faithful in taking back the White House has meant that not enough has been said about the imperative of taking back control of the place John Kerry will hopefully be leaving -- the U.S. Senate.

If Kerry is the next occupant of the Oval Office, he will need legislative muscle to undo the disastrous policies of the Bush administration, which have damaged our economy, degraded our environment, added millions to the roll of America's uninsured, and seriously undermined our national security. No executive order can reverse all that.

And if -- close your ears, kids -- Bush is actually able to scare his way to reelection, a Democratic Senate will be the only thing standing in the way of a second-term all-out assault on America's working families and the implementation of a radical right-wing social agenda. Don't forget, the next president will probably end up appointing at least a couple of Supreme Court justices -- and Bush has made it clear that he'd fill any vacancies with clones of Antonin Scalia. See ya later, Roe vs. Wade; nice knowing ya, civil liberties. Don't forget to turn your clocks back a hundred years.

The good news is that the Democrats have a pretty good shot at turning Bill Frist into the Senate minority leader. (Don't you love the ring of that?)

In looking at the Senate races Democrats can win, I focused on the three open seats held by retiring Republicans in Illinois, Colorado and Oklahoma. In each of those states the Democrats are putting forth a candidate -- Barack Obama in Illinois, Ken Salazar in Colorado, and Brad Carson in Oklahoma -- capable of bringing a new type of leadership to Washington.

Just for starters, Obama is black, Salazar is Hispanic, and Carson is a member of the Cherokee Nation -- no small matter when you consider that despite making up over 25 percent of the U.S. population (accounting for more than 71 million Americans), there are currently no blacks, no Hispanics, and just one Native American in the Senate. The World's Most Exclusive Club, indeed.

But what separates and elevates these candidates goes far beyond race and ethnicity. It's their ability to focus on the Other America -- the millions struggling to make ends meet -- while retaining the ability to draw supporters from across the political spectrum.

As a bonus, the three are running against some of the most troubling opponents to ever come down the political pike. Even if Obama, Salazar and Carson weren't so appealing, their opponents -- Alan Keyes in Illinois, Pete Coors in Colorado, and Tom Coburn in Oklahoma -- are so repellent that their resounding defeat should be a priority for all sentient Americans. More on these bozos as we go along.

The nation saw firsthand the reasons for Obama's widespread appeal when he delivered his headline-making keynote speech at the Democratic Convention: he is brilliant (a former president of the Harvard Law Review), charismatic, eloquent, and in possession of a life story that embodies the American dream. And thanks to his suddenly sky-high national profile, he'll arrive in Washington with the kind of clout most freshmen senators can only dream of -- unless, of course, they're married to a former president of the United States.

More important, he has a passionate vision of what he wants to do with that clout: "George Bush," he told me, "clearly believes that the role of government is to protect the powerful from the powerless. We need to dramatically change our priorities."

At the moment Obama is way out in front of Keyes, the arch-conservative commentator-cum-carpetbagger who, since belatedly entering the race, has helped dig his own political grave with a series of outrageous comments. He has equated Obama with slave owners, labeled Dick Cheney's lesbian daughter a "selfish hedonist," and claimed that if the Lord's son were around and living in Chicago, "Christ would not vote for Barack Obama."

Colorado's Salazar faces a tougher challenge: There are 193,000 more registered Republicans than Democrats in his state. Nevertheless, the popular two-time state attorney general has been able to open a lead by combining a two-fisted attack on President Bush's mishandling of Iraq, domestic security, the economy and the environment with a down-home, folksy style. His pickup-truck persona (complete with blue jeans and cowboy hat) has won him the support of a majority of the state's rural voters.

And when I heard him speak in Los Angeles last month, it was clear that his authenticity touched just as deep a chord with urban sophisticates. His commitment to closing the growing disparities between the opportunities available to the Two Americas is unmistakable.

He speaks movingly of how this division has affected his home state: "While the folks living in the densely populated counties along Colorado's Front Range have prospered over the last decade, those living in Colorado's 50 rural counties are struggling to survive. Their schools are not getting the attention they deserve, they are losing healthcare providers and access, they have been losing agricultural jobs, and no manufacturing jobs are locating there."

Salazar's opponent is Pete Coors, a political greenhorn. So far, this brewery heir's main contribution to the national dialogue has been his full-throated advocacy for lowering the drinking age from 21 to 18, arguing that such a move would encourage more sensible teenage drinking. Just the kind of altruistic leadership we need more of in Washington.

Recent Stories

One more good reason to lift the embargo on Cuba
Let's seize the potential of the nation's sugar-based ethanol -- before China beats us to it.
Rush Limbaugh was right
The blogosphere's reaction to the New Yorker cover proves that the Bush era has killed a lot of liberals' sense of humor. And that's not funny.
Life in the catbird seat for Obama
Democrats have watched leads disappear before, especially when they sub "more of the same" for "change."
Can you hear me now? Obama's missing 2 percent
By failing to survey cellphone-only voters, pollsters could be undercounting Barack Obama's support by millions of voters.
Why progressives should keep organizing on MyBarackObama.com
Some Obama supporters say we should disband our FISA group now that the vote is past. I disagree. If progressives are silent, the campaign will take us for granted.

Daily Newsletter

Get Salon in your mailbox!