Let the litigation begin

The suit charges each of the four parents with five counts of parental negligence, which involve their allowing their sons to amass a cache of semiautomatic weapons; stockpile bombs and explosives; continue to hang out together, since each was "a co-conspirator and accomplice in a prior criminal act"; to "author extremist writings of a hateful nature"; and to continue to grant their sons "extraordinary privileges despite knowledge that [they] had been engaged in prior serious criminal activity."

But Fieger and the Shoelses seemed to have divergent agendas for their crusade. Fieger, who recently staged an unsuccessful run for governor of Michigan, delivered an impassioned opening statement that sounded like a stump speech for a third-party candidate for president. He ripped into "the excesses of liberal social engineering" that have "contributed to the erosion of personal responsibility and an excessive preoccupation with self-indulgent and material pursuits." But then he quickly turned on "conservatives" who he charged "destroyed the social safety net," including access to quality medical care and mental health treatment, "made the reality of a living wage unlikely" and destroyed our future with "mindless rhetoric about Second Amendment rights." He acknowledged that he developed his agenda independently of the Shoels family. "Those were my statements. The family doesnt tell me how to try the lawsuit. I think they agree with them. I ran them by them."

Michael Shoels, by contrast, ticked off a priority list that included morality in the home, prayer in the schools and an end to all forms of hate, including but not limited to pervasive racial bigotry. He repeatedly returned to the racial abuse his family suffered before and after the shootings, which he says went unanswered by law enforcement. Vonda Shoels remained quiet through most of the proceedings, but responded quickly and forcefully when asked what she hopes to accomplish with the suit: "Change! Because no one should have to suffer like we had to suffer."

None of the other families have announced lawsuits yet, and none had immediate reactions to the Shoelses' suit. Neither the Harris nor Klebold families commented on it, directly or through attorneys.

The lawsuit isn't the only wrangling about money in the wake of the Columbine tragedy. Locally there's been growing tension about the use of a $2.3 million Healing Fund, donated by strangers around the country to help the Columbine victims' families, as well as the 23 wounded survivors. Very little of that money has actually been distributed.

In the past few days, there have been local news reports detailing how victims' parents are upset about the way the money will be distributed. Several parents complained of mounting medical bills, and one mother told of being unable to work since the trauma, and having to beg for money to cover rent. A Wednesday meeting between families and Jefferson County District Attorney Dave Thomas, who serves as co-chairman of the fund, seemed to ease some of the tension. Thomas announced that the funds would be used primarily to assist victims' families, with a much smaller allotment for the community. A survey will be distributed to families to resolve details, particularly whether the money should be divided equally, or based on need.

Meanwhile, victim Cassie Bernall's family declined to seek riches when they chose a publisher to tell the story of their daughter's conversion from troubled teen to Christian martyr. Despite interest from major mainstream publishers, they sold the book, titled "She Said Yes," to a small Christian publishing firm.

• View blog reactions